fullthottle: (Default)
thot and die. ([personal profile] fullthottle) wrote2019-11-03 08:46 pm
Entry tags:

COCKBLOCKERS: EDELGARD, GRUNE, SHIRAISHI

COCKBLOCKER
On Monday afternoon, all three of their clamshells will ping! from wherever they have it. Should they pick it up to see what all the fuss is about, they will realize that their RULEBOOK app has updated once again. There's one more rule in their list now, though everything on this page remains unreadable to others...

The new rule is:

6. You must remember that you SHARE A COMMON GOAL.
The notification will pop up once again -- guess updates are just like this!

WEE 🚨 OOO 🚨 WEE 🚨 OOO HEY SLUTS ARE YOU READY TO GET UP OFF YOUR LIL 🍑 ASS 🍑 AND BLOCK 🚫🚫🚫 SOME COCKS 🐓🐓🐓 ? ? ? 🍆💦 🍆💦 🍆💦 YOU ARE THE 👮 FUN 👮 POLICE 👮 AND YOU'RE HERE TO RAIN ☂️ ☂️ ☂️ ON SOME PARADES !!!! UP AND AT 'EM TO MEET THE B̴̨̃ͩ̈́ͬͨ̕I͋͐ͫ͘͘Gͪ͐͗̓̓̃́̚G̴̀̓E͛́̀S͂̃͂͐͌̽̓̔T̢̓̊̎͑̐ ̷̴̃́H̓ͨ̒́͘Ỏ̏͗̋͑ͮͯ̌ ̨̊̎̅ͫ̊͢O͛ͯͣ̌̈́̋ͣ̀͝F͋̄̚͞͝ ̴̔̉̍͟A̴̾L̨̂̊̔̀L̍ͦ͆̏̚
As usual, they will be brought to a familiar meeting place with a familiar host -- but this time, something is different. This time they'll realize quickly that they are no longer alone...


felinguistic: (11)

[personal profile] felinguistic 2019-11-04 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I can swing things so I pick Hizamaru, sure. And to pick someone else if need be. But if they don't check our vigilante, or if he comes back clear we're minus an option. There is someone I think would be worth offering some protection to - given they can pass us messages from the recently departed.

I suppose the big question is is it better to focus on fully protecting one person, or giving multiple people some kind of protection.
Edited 2019-11-04 22:09 (UTC)
warmness: (joining the sea)

[personal profile] warmness 2019-11-05 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
Hm... I think if we focus all on one person, it might be best if we have a reason to suspect they may be targeted? But if we don't, or if we think multiple people might be at risk, spreading out isn't so bad.
hegemonstrous: (*a and i'll write your name)

[personal profile] hegemonstrous 2019-11-05 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
The sexorcism is a possibility I don't want to ignore. Both my and Shiraishi's roles are for more specific circumstances than yours, so I'd let your pick guide us, Grune. But there's an advantage to all trying the same person, since if there's even a slight chance they're a demon, we could free them that way.

On the other hand, if there's a demon about, but you can't pick them as you'll lose the benefit of your protective power, I'll choose them myself so we can at least save them after execution.

In that case, Shiraishi, you should pick whoever you feel is best. But I will resolve the situation with Katy and Haymitch on my own, as I won't be a burden to our group.
felinguistic: (13)

[personal profile] felinguistic 2019-11-05 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I've said I have someone else in mind. If there's no objections, I'll stick to that and we'll hope that things work out.

At least we'll know who's clear, and can do a little voting manipulation if it looks like we're veering wildly in the wrong direction.
warmness: (like the land)

[personal profile] warmness 2019-11-06 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
Hopefully we'll figure things out this week better than we did last week.

[ although in their defense, everyone did acknowledge illumi as a suspect they just were suspicious of how straightforward the clue was and wanted to double check every angle

but still. ]


We'll have more time to plan for next week.